Go ahead re-use my content, just don’t mess with my circle of traffic!

(Note: Props to Brankica for her post on Comment Spammers this week that also got me fired up to write about this. I don’t usually get fired up.)

I’m just a blogging neophyte who wanted to learn something new and add a creative outlet to my life. As a new dad, I’ve researched, evaluated, purchased and experienced a plethora of baby related products and issues so I thought I would share some of my two-bit wisdom with others via a blog.

Some of my general criticism about blogging has always been that a lot of it lacked true original content, was merely commentary on someone else’s commentary and was often circular conversations among sometimes artificial groups that created a lot of noise. Rising above that noise has become truly challenging which has in turn created more noise about how to rise above it. But I digress…

So I went about tinkering with my blog theme, adding plugins, creating a twitter account and writing posts as best as I could. In late December I came across an issue that I thought was under-reported and decided to write a post regarding the ban in Belgium and France on the sale of those popular foam floor mats that often cover our children’s rooms (you can read about it here).

Things were relatively quiet over the New Year but the post started gaining momentum as it got shared by various people on Twitter, Facebook and elsewhere and the hits started to increase over the last week. I was giddy to see my Google analytics page bump up with hits from around the world. It was also interesting to watch the post rise in the google search rankings as it got more hits and more recognition through tweets and comments. To get a mere 100 views in a day was pretty sweet for this little amateur.

From a purely academic point of view (ok ok, vanity too), I greatly enjoy looking at visitor data, country locations, traffic sources and keyword searches on my Google analytics page.  I can also see firsthand the power of Facebook in terms of driving traffic (more than google searches in this particular case) and that people really search for some random things sometimes. So when I did a keyword search yesterday morning I saw that my post was #1 on Google results. Yeah Baby! Except that… further down there was a post that had the exact same title.

Curious I clicked and found MY EXACT SAME POST on another website. It wasn’t a post about my post (I know one can create a LOT of content that way with little new thought), but a complete duplication just in different font colors. Oh No You Didn’t!

Fair use, basically unethical or simply plagiarism?

Here are the facts:

  • Permission was not sought to publish the article on their website
  • There was no by-line at the top attributing the article
  • It was copied essentially in its entirety including links, paragraph formatting and video embed
  • At the bottom of the page there was a link to papalogic.com, but with no explanation as to why or that it was the source of the article (Note:the embedded url was later updated to link to the post itself following my initial complaint)
  • According to wordpress, there are no trackbacks/pingbacks from this article
  • According Google analytics, there are exactly zero referrals from this website back to my article

At the same time:

  • On the website’s Twitter page there was a tweet linking back to my post on their site
  • On the the website’s Facebook page, there was a wall post linking back to my article on their site

So basically, all the traffic was being redirected to MY article on THEIR website, essentially hijacking the traffic that my content has generated. Today for example, my post was displaced from the #1 spot.

The Stern Email

The fact that the article was re-used, though annoying, could perhaps slide. I’m pretty lenient and easy going with respect to commenting and questionable pingbacks, but this one hit a nerve. The fact that the article was being used to drive traffic to another website rather than mine and that the fundamentals of social media were being broken pushed me to act.

I contacted the website via email and voiced my disappointment that my content was being used without attribution and without permission.  I will spare you details of the conversation, but it did take several emails to explain that, regardless of whether you are an ad-revenue-generating, good-cause-focused news website , you cannot just use someone else’s content without asking them or giving them credit – even if they are just a little guy in the blogosphere. Sure, some people probably do not mind, but those are usually product pitches looking for air time and distribution.

After a request to remove the article altogether, the post was later altered to include another news article and some clips from mine with some “papalogic wrote…” and “read more at….” Not much original thought, but fair enough by internet standards. Happy enough.

Don’t mess with my circle of traffic!

So, problem solved. But all this got me thinking about how web traffic gets built and how it can so easily get destroyed when someone or something disrupts your Circle of Traffic.

Below is the Circle of Blog Traffic according to Papalogic (Thanks to Tristan for sharing his love of infographics)

Circle of blog traffic

This is probably obvious to the experts out there who preach (via an ebook of course) the importance of leveraging multiple methods to drive traffic to your blog beyond just good content, like keyword use in articles, commenting, Twitter interaction, Facebook fan pages, RSS, etc. but I began to visualize sources of traffic and the paths they take.

As you can see, the post is at the center with all traffic (red arrows) leading back to it. Another title for the slide would be “All Roads Should Lead to Your Post, Not Rome”.

The key actions a blogger takes at conception (blue arrows) are designed to initiate the traffic flows and are designed to drive everything back to the post (or the main blog).

At the same time, effective use of other channels drives others to create more traffic in the post’s direction through re-tweets, re-blogs, sharing on Facebook or elsewhere (green arrows).

We also know that the super secret sauce at Google and other search engines (probably just thousand island or ketchup & mayonnaise) takes into account all that “chatter” as it decides whether to push a link up or down its search rankings. Depending on how noisy the niche is, the chatter may ultimately – if you’re lucky – reach a point where things go viral or the post reaches the top of the search rankings for a prized set of keywords. That’s right, you’ve reached blogging nirvana. Now start again and right another post.

So what does this have to do with the beginning of this post?

As I sat there yesterday, pondering the situation, I realized that I was not so upset that my content had been re-used. Rather, I was steaming because my traffic had been hijacked. By repurposing the content as its own and leveraging social media channels, it was re-directing content to its website rather than my blog. Even if there was a tiny link somewhere on the page, all the traffic terminated right there and never made it made back to me. At the same time, the chatter it was creating in its own social media sphere of activity was raising the page rank of its version of my post on the back of mine.

It’s quite common for major websites (the lifehackers, gawkers, gizmodos of the world) to create a lot of content by mentioning and re-using other posts but in those cases the traffic is always redirected to the original content in a very obvious and prominent way, often creating server problems for that little guy if he’s not expecting the spike.

So there you have it: Go ahead, re-use my content, just don’t mess with traffic!


Have you had your content copied or your traffic hijacked? (odds are, yes)

What do you think?Share your thoughts in the comments!

If you liked this post, please re-tweet or share it!

13 Responses to Go ahead re-use my content, just don’t mess with my circle of traffic!
  1. Brankica from Live Your Love
    January 12, 2011 | 12:23 pm

    Wow, first let me say thank you for mentioning me at the beginning of your post.

    Second, what happened to your article is so annoying. Basically, what I have noticed, is that the big sites can copy a small site’s post, and them being big, Google sees your post as a duplicate!!

    It is really not fair to do something like that, and linking even with a nofollow link to you would be a fair thing to do.

    I was told once by some people smarter and more experienced people to inform the web host of the site, because no web host want’s that on his server. I know of many situations where an e-mail to the owner just caused them to get ugly instead of fixing the mistake!
    Brankica from Live Your Love recently posted…How to use StumbleUpon Don’t bury yourself…or your fellow bloggersMy Profile

  2. papa
    Twitter: papalogic
    January 12, 2011 | 3:33 pm

    Hi Brankica, thanks for the comment. Contacting the host is also a good idea although not sure if they care so much about a post from a small guy. Thnaks for dropping by.

  3. Sire
    January 13, 2011 | 1:31 am

    I had the same thing happen to me but I wasn’t so generous. I insisted they remove the whole thing, as well as several other posts they pilfered. When that didn’t do any good I contacted their host and complained. They made sure all my copied posts were taken down.
    Sire recently posted…Of Good Hosts And Bad Hosts- Beware The Bad HostsMy Profile

    • papa
      Twitter: papalogic
      January 13, 2011 | 1:41 am

      I was ready to move to Defcon 1 if I continued to be ignored, but at that point it was probably in the realm of fair-ish use and was not worth the additional aggravation. Thanks for the comment!

  4. Adrienne
    January 13, 2011 | 2:28 pm

    Great post but sorry this happened to you. I think I can safely say this hasn’t happened to me yet so I’ll keep my fingers crossed that I never run across this type of problem. I do teach others why when they are writing articles it’s best to have an actual URL link in their resource box in case some sites use their content and their anchor text doesn’t show up. Doesn’t much help with blog posts though.

    Glad everything was eventually settled, to some extent that is. Good luck with future posts.

    Adrienne
    Adrienne recently posted…Traffic Update Here I Come!My Profile

    • papa
      Twitter: papalogic
      January 14, 2011 | 9:26 am

      Hi Adrienne. Thanks for you comment. I guess it’s always good to keep an eye out for potential duplicate content.

      Thanks for dropping by,

      papalogic

  5. Sally
    January 13, 2011 | 2:39 pm

    Hey Papa,

    You know I have seen many sites like this, gets on my nerves, it seems they use some sort of script or something that pulls in articles mostly from some of the directories, I never knew they stole blog posts as well.

    I think it is terribly unfair, and I agree with you that they are hijacking y(our)traffic.

    Unfortunately it looks like the only thing we can do is contact them, as you did, or contact the hosting company like Sire did.

    Thing is, how do you keep track of all these content scrapers/stealers if, like you said there was no trackback or pingback???

    Sally 🙂
    Sally recently posted…Go Ahead… Make Me Hop Onto Your Blog!My Profile

    • papa
      Twitter: papalogic
      January 14, 2011 | 9:29 am

      Hi Sally. Yeah, it’s annoying, but c’est la vie. Ironically (or gallingly) the website in question was scrape-proof, you couldn’t simply copy the text (well, easily at least)! Thanks for passing by and good luck hopping. papalogic.

  6. Amr Boghdady
    January 15, 2011 | 3:32 pm

    Papa, as much as it is annoying, you should consider yourself lucky that the other website’s webmaster did correspond to your e-mails, and accepted to alter the article.

    In my situation, a few of the tutorials I have on my website were exactly duplicated without even putting a link back to my website.
    All my e-mails to the website owner was sadly unanswered.

    I think I will have to follow Brankica’s advice and e-mail the host of that website. Hope I get some positive action from them
    Amr Boghdady recently posted…Dative Case GermanMy Profile

  7. papa
    Twitter: papalogic
    January 16, 2011 | 1:08 am

    Sorry to hear that you’re in a similar (yet worse) situation. Contacting the host is definitely the logical next step to get this taken care of. Alternatively, if this website uses twitter, for example, public shaming can also sometimes work: check out Wordful’s guide to fighting “Blog Plagiarism Guerrilla Style” at http://bit.ly/fqcJ6q. Thanks for dropping by and good luck.

  8. Vote on this article at blogengage.com
    January 29, 2011 | 6:09 am

    How social media can steal your traffic…

    All the tools available to bloggers – whether social networking, SEO, RSS, etc – are mainly designed to drive traffic back to one’s content. The circle of blog traffic is quite beautiful to watch, but it can also be easily broken….

  9. Jack
    Twitter: thejackb
    February 11, 2011 | 9:16 pm

    Unfortunately this happens quite frequently. I have had entire blogs created from my content. That is not an exaggeration.

    When I find it I do the best that I can to correct the situation ASAP. Often times it takes little more than a quick email to their ISP.

    I have noticed that it seems more common with review blogs that focus mostly on comments about products and less on stories.

    • papa
      Twitter: papalogic
      February 12, 2011 | 1:11 pm

      Hi Jack – I guess I haven’t had the “flattery” of having an entire blog created based on my content yet.

      How did you find out? Do you pro-actively search out duplicate content?

      Thanks for dropping by,

      papalogic.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

CommentLuv badge